Summary
A resident argued the signs were never backed by a traffic study; the council agreed to a study on car counts, speeds and accident history before any removal.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 1
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 8, 2026.
Impact analysis
No cost impact since no signs are being removed or installed right now.
Drivers who currently must make unnecessary three-way stops, if the study supports removal.
Drivers who must stop unnecessarily, and the resident who requested the removal.
Mentions & discussions (2)
City Council - Oct 8, 2026
A resident asked the city to remove the stop signs at this intersection, but the traffic study failed all five engineering warrants for an all-way stop. A motion to remove them died without a second, so the signs stay up unless residents petition with new data.
City Council - Sep 10, 2026
A resident argued the signs were never backed by a traffic study; the council agreed to a study on car counts, speeds and accident history before any removal.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Van
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.